<span>If we can compare Don Quixote and king Arthur, we might say that both were nobles, sympathetic and they truly wish the best for those around them. Don Quixote might be considered as a “normal person” which is similar to King Arthur who was a “normal person”. However, they had the possibility of becoming something else, to have a higher position. They share the same background. THey might be different in terms of goals while King Arthur wanted to make his people happy and content in a peaceful way, Don Quixote, in his place, would have use violence to achieve his objectives. To conclude, it is wise to say that King Arthur could be a hero today because he would not use violence and would help people.<span>
</span></span>
Answer:
He Is the answer. There is no explanation for that.
The first and third one are correct. The middle one is fiction.
I believe the answer is B. Noun. Since you're describing something.
Answer:
1. Tom was afraid, but he was sincere in his testimony.
2. He did not deny that he had any contact with Mayella, as she asked him to do favors for her.
3. He didn't deny that he was inside Mayella's house the night she was raped, but he was there to fix a door.
4. The testimony of tone contradicts that of Mayella.
5. Tom claims that Mayella held him inside the house, saying that he saved money so that the children could leave and leave them alone.
Explanation:
Tom's testimony is a tense moment in history. Firstly, because we can see Tom's nervousness and his concern in reporting what actually happened in a convincing way. Tom is sincere and narrates all the contact he had with Mayella and these interactions between them, he reinforces his own innocence and even if he shows information that contradicts Mayella's he is not absolved of the accusations.
