Answer: Intimacy
Explanation: Intimacy is a close relationship that can be between friends, spouses, and can implies sexual intimacy, though not necessarily, i.e intimacy does not necessarily mean sex. It is first and foremost a desire for a shared feeling of happiness or a sense of relaxation between close friends, spouses, etc. This is, of course, in the context of privacy when intimacy, that is, a shared close sense of happiness, is not shared with someone who is not so close. So intimacy and privacy are shared by some who are related in any way mentioned.
Happiness and intimacy are linked because by increasing intimacy with the partner, friend, the openness increases, the secrets, if any, disappear, the conversation increases, all of which means a greater sense of happiness. Perhaps the reason is that the time we live in and not having time to share with a partner makes us alienated, so every such intimate moment and time spent with a partner enhances a sense of happiness. With intimacy, good feeling increases, and practice has shown that when we feel good and feel good about ourselves, everything else follows in that manner, so well-being increases, that is, the complete feeling of happiness.
From almost the beginning there were two competing parties<span>–the </span>Federalists<span> of Washington, Hamilton and Adams and the </span>Democratic-Republicans<span> of ... Thereafter, the </span>Whig Party<span>, which had failed to take a strong stand on the matter of </span>slavery<span>, faded from the </span>political<span> scene and was replaced by the</span>Republican Party<span> </span>
Unauthorized disclosure of Secret information could be a cause of serious damage to national security.
<h3>What is unauthorized disclosure of information?</h3>
This is a term that has to do with the disclosure of information in a way that it gets to the wrong hands.
This is a very serious issue of concern. It could lead to issues that may affect the security and peace of a country.
Read more on national security here:
brainly.com/question/27204242
#SPJ1
Translation results
Karl Popper
Ele argumentou que a ciência não usa a indução, e a indução é de fato um mito. Em vez disso, o conhecimento é criado por conjecturas e críticas. ... Salmon critica Popper com o fundamento de que as previsões precisam ser feitas tanto para fins práticos quanto para testar teorias.
desculpe se eu não fiz sentido não sou muito bom em falar português
