1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enot [183]
3 years ago
13

By Day 3, post a state or local legal tenet that has come under fire for potentially violating a constitutionally protected free

dom or right. Identify the law that potentially violates a constitutionally protected freedom or right, describe the jurisdiction from where the law originates, and examine the constitutional violation.
Law
1 answer:
Eduardwww [97]3 years ago
3 0

A state law that has come under fire for violating a constitutionally protected freedom or right is the case of <em>Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer (2017)</em>.

This case held that a Missouri program that denied a grant to a religious school, while providing grants to similarly situated non-religious groups violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.

You might be interested in
Which way is the wagon accelerating​
Anon25 [30]
The way the wagon is accelerating is to the left
4 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between a solicitor, a barrister and a lawyer?
Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

The term 'lawyer' is an umbrella term for both solicitors and barristers. Solicitors provide general legal advice on a variety of issues. Barristers are specialists in certain legal fields that solicitors can instruct on behalf of their client to appear in court.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does it mean to describe the nature of the offence committed?
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Answer:

Criminal law is the most ancient branch of the law. Many wise observers have tried to define and explain it, but the explanations often include many complex and subtle distinctions. A traditional criminal law course would include a lot of discussions on criminal intent, the nature of criminal versus civil responsibility, and the constitutional rights accorded the accused. But in this chapter, we will consider only the most basic aspects of intent, responsibility, and constitutional rights.

Unlike civil actions, where plaintiffs seek compensation or other remedies for themselves, crimes involve “the state” (the federal government, a state government, or some subunit of state government). This is because crimes involve some “harm to society” and not just harm to certain individuals. But “harm to society” is not always evident in the act itself. For example, two friends of yours at a party argue, take the argument outside, and blows are struck; one has a bloody nose and immediately goes home. The crimes of assault and battery have been committed, even though no one else knows about the fight and the friends later make up. By contrast, suppose a major corporation publicly announces that it is closing operations in your community and moving operations to Southeast Asia. There is plenty of harm to society as the plant closes down and no new jobs take the place of the company’s jobs. Although the effects on society are greater in the second example, only the first example is a crime.

Crimes are generally defined by legislatures, in statutes; the statutes describe in general terms the nature of the conduct they wish to criminalize. For government punishment to be fair, citizens must have clear notice of what is criminally prohibited. Ex post facto laws—laws created “after the fact” to punish an act that was legal at the time—are expressly prohibited by the US Constitution. Overly vague statutes can also be struck down by courts under a constitutional doctrine known as “void for vagueness.”

5 0
3 years ago
Are petitioners liable for the loss of the pawned jewelry ? why or why not?
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer:

No. Unless they do not peacefully stand with what the petition.

Explanation:

Taking the BLM petiton for example, the petition was made for peace and equality, and that's what the owner of the petition intended.

There were people who took advantage of this protest and turned it into a way for burgulary and started stealing under the circumstances that there was a peaceful protest.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the 'role of uae helping the poor and needy one'?
tatiyna

Answer:xhdxhchchchchhhcchchhchcchdhdhdjdjjjd judjrrjrrjrjr. Jusjssjsjsjjs

Explanation:

Hduhudhd

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Choose the term that best matches the description given.
    8·1 answer
  • 5. In a bench trial, the
    10·2 answers
  • ______ normally are white rectangles with black letters or symbols.
    9·1 answer
  • What is a promise given in exchange for performance?
    12·1 answer
  • While driving your vehicle, if you see this traffic sign it means...<br><br> Plz help fast
    7·2 answers
  • In the case, Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court broaden the protection against
    14·1 answer
  • Due within 15 minutes. Please help.
    15·1 answer
  • Pháp luật đại cương là gì
    13·1 answer
  • How Do I Poop in my pants?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of these is a responsibility of an American Citizen?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!