Not only were the initial colonists in the Chesapeake region lazy and unambitious but their aspirations were also hindered before they even got started. A single plant provided an answer to these issues. However, the colonists eventually ran into a lot of issues as a result of this cash crop.
<h3>Who are Colonists?</h3>
The practice of colonialism involves one country assuming complete or partial political control over another and settling there with settlers in order to take advantage of that country's resources and economy. It might be challenging to tell colonialism from imperialism because both involve the political and economic dominance of a dominating country over a weak territory. From the dawn of time until the beginning of the 20th century, strong nations fought openly for control of new territories through colonialism. By the time World War I broke out in 1914, nearly every continent had been colonized by European nations. Although colonialism is not as actively implemented as it once was, there is evidence that it still has influence in the modern world.
Thus, yes the colonists in the Chesapeake region were lazy and ignorant.
For more information on Chesapeake, refer to the given link:
brainly.com/question/5231025
#SPJ4
*At least 12 Philippine Army soldiers die in clashes with the Abu Sayyaf. (BBC).
*A curfew has ended in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir after 52 days of protest allowing for an all-party delegation to visit the state on Sunday. (Times of India).
*The number of Zika virus infected in Singapore rises above 40. (NBC).
*A lightning strike from a freak thunderstorm kills 323 reindeer in Norway. (The Washington Post).
*Multiple individuals rammed a van into the entrance of the Brussels National Institute of Criminology building, setting its laboratories on fire. No casualties have been reported. At least five people are arrested. (BBC).
Hope this helps!
Because it is in the western hemisphere.
ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup ketchup
I'd answer "Chief Executive" for both of these questions.
In both cases, the Governor is acting in their role as the Chief Executive of the State. Any ceremonial or messaging is done through that role as Chief Executive.