I believe the answer to this is "true." Really, all conclusions on all events are subjective. But considering history, conclusions on events are especially prone to subjectivity. Consider who writes the history books. If one country wins a war against another country, they will write about themselves as the noble party and portray the enemy as villainous. However, this may not be the real case. This occurs much more than we think, and we must research different events to make sure we are not blindly buying into what people say. Hope this helps.
By reading the text you'll be able to come up with a answer.
When given the choice between right or being kind choose kind
#1 : A. meanings of collective nouns
#2: (I am not too sure about this one but i think it's either A or C
#3: B. Define
#4: Some of these nouns are pretty amusing
Sorry for being 3 days late :(
The answer is the difficulty of determining what is real. Typical modernists had a loss of meaning in the modern world, so there themes included the question of "What is real?" There was a search for meaning in a world without God, and a search for self with a critique of traditional values.
