Answer: $495,000
Explanation: Opportunity cost can be defined as the cost of profits that were foregone by choosing one alternative over other. It is a part of economic cost and is not considered while calculating the accounting cost.
In the given case, company has to forego the sale of 3000 units due to the special order production, thus, the lost sale of those 3000 units is the opportunity cost of fulfilling the special order.
This, can be computed as follows :-
opportunity cost = 3000 units * $165
= $495,000
Answer:
$1 = 1.372 CD
Explanation:
Spot rate, 1$ = 1.3750 Canadian dollars
Canadian securities annualized return = 6%
U.S. securities annualized return = 6.5%
Term = 6 month ≅(180 days)
Forward exchange rate in 180 days, 1$ = Spot rate * (1+US rate*6/12) / (1+CD rate*6/12)
= 1.3750 CD * (1 + 6%*6/12) / (1 + 6.5%*6/12)
= 1.3750 CD * (1 + 0.03) / (1 + 0.0325)
= 1.3750 CD * 1.03/1.0325
= 1.371670702179177 CD
= 1.372 CD
So, the the U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar exchange rate in the 180-day forward market is $1 = 1.372 CD
Answer:
The correct answer would be option A, Medicare Taxes.
Explanation:
It is quite common now a days to work with contractors to get help from them, either in the form of services or human resources, etc. The contractor provide the company what it wants according to the needs. For example if a company needs human resource for its customer service department, the contractor will provide them the employees according to the company's need. So when you hire the contractor for getting you employees, there is no need to pay the medicare taxes of the contractor. It is not the responsibility of the company to pay medical expenses of the contractor, rather its contractor's own responsibility to fulfill its medicare expenses.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Innovative Change is a change introduced by the management which encourages all the employees to achieve the target and goals set, with the boosted enthusiasm and the employees tend to accept such change.
An expected overtime from any department is not an acceptable change, and there is no innovation in such change.
Although if a working technique would have been introduced to reduce the time and increase the capacity of workers or accountants, that would be referred to innovative change.