Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
First, suppose that nothing has changed, and possibility p is still 0.56. It's our null hypothesis. Now, we've got Bernoulli distribution, but 30 is big enough to consider Gaussian distribution instead.
It has mean μ= np = 30×0.56=16.8
standard deviation s = √npq
sqrt(30×0.56×(1-0.56)) = 2.71
So 21 is (21-16.8)/2.71 = 1.5494 standard deviations above the mean. So the level increased with a ˜ 0.005 level of significance, and there is sufficient evidence.
Answer:
Any negative number would be a counterexample.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since negative numbers get smaller as you multiply them by a larger number, this would prove this conjecture false.
Answer:
of the lasagna is left
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
Given:
Amount of lasagna Rico eats = 1/9
Amount of lasagna His friend eats = 1/18
To Find:
The amount lasagna is left =?
Solution:
Total lasagna ate by both Rico and his friend = Amount of lasagna Rico eats + Amount of lasagna His friend eats
Total lasagna ate by both Rico and his friend = 
Total lasagna ate by both Rico and his friend = 
Total lasagna ate by both Rico and his friend = 
Total lasagna ate by both Rico and his friend = 
The amount lasagna is left = 1 - Total lasagna ate by both Rico and his friend.
The amount lasagna is left = 
The amount lasagna is left =
The amount lasagna is left =