The section from the poem "The Caged Birds" illustrates the condition of the bird which has no control over its fate. It is explicitly captured within a prison and metaphors like "clipped wings" and "tied feet" propose that even if it tried, it is bound not to leave the premise it is contained in.
Further, in "Sonnet 29", the writer's allegorical language and expression portray the image of the narrator in the society where he feels unwanted. However, in the provided lines of the sonnet, the speaker laments on his position as an outcast and failure, also suggesting that this fate cannot be suppressed. Again, here, the condition of the narrator cannot be changed, same as the bird's situation.
Therefore, the common connotation suggested by the two excerpts is: "they both are angry at their circumstances," because they are stuck within their unfortunate conditions.
Answer:
Decide on a balanced timeframe for each treatment and note which is more effective.
Explanation:
To avoid stress and overloading the patient's body, the best option is to have the doctors talk and determine a balanced period of time for the patient to be subjected to both treatments, not all at once, but following a logical order and benefits. After this period, doctors must evaluate which treatment was most effective and continue using the winning treatment, until the patient is cured.
The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
<em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>y</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>3</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>b</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>y</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>p</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>f</u></em><em><u>f</u></em>
Honestly I would choose A.