1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svet_ta [14]
3 years ago
15

Please help me, good explanation = brainliest

History
1 answer:
user100 [1]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The reason why the colonists threw the tea in the ocean was to show that they didn't like being taxed. They said 'taxation without representation' in these revolts.

Explanation:

The reason the Boston tea party occurred was that the colonists didn't like being taxed for tea. Even though the English tea was cheaper than the tea from Holland, the colonists felt that the English were trying to find a way to trick the colonists into paying the taxes. The colonists wanted to have a say in their government, they wanted to have the rights to make their own choices, that way there wouldn't be that many revolts against the English.

( I learned about this last week, I hope this helps! OwO)

You might be interested in
do you believe that anyone can be journalist? Should blogs be considered news sources? why or why not?​
vovikov84 [41]

Anyone can be a journalist as long as they have clear language

7 0
3 years ago
The Heiji War was _____.
Sedaia [141]

Answer: The Heiji War was a civil war between the Taira and Minamoto clans.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which is the following is the largest city in sourthern city•<br><br>​
andre [41]

Answer: Jacksonville

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
HELP ME PLZ<br> Why are compliance and enforcement procedures necessary?
Virty [35]
<span>Compliance assistance helps the regulated community (business, industry and government) understand and meet their environmental obligations</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. How would you argue against Aristotle’s defense of Natural slavery? Did he make false assumptions? Were his arguments illogic
larisa [96]

Answer: Natural slavery is inhumane and degrading.

Explanation:

Although natural slavery seems like it makes sense for a constructive society and Aristotle thought that slaves needed their masters to survive because they were so helpless, he was generalizing and his argument is flawed when most of the slaves who were freed in the 1900s could survive well on their own. I think I can argue against Aristotles arguements for natural slavery because his assumption is that slaves were lesser, more inferior humans or tools. I can disprove these by the obvious mistreatment these slaves were put through like: their owner hitting them or starving them. People who were slaves could not marry or raise children without their owner’s permission. And their owner could sell them or their children at any time.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is franking privileges?
    15·2 answers
  • What type of language does Tan use in this<br> passage?
    14·1 answer
  • What was henry grady's vision for the new south
    10·1 answer
  • In world war ii, while germany was battling with russia, germany and italy were taking over more of _____.
    15·1 answer
  • Why did French involvement in the American Revolution negatively affect the
    7·1 answer
  • HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • The feathered serpent was an important image to many Mesoamerican civilizations. The serpent represented a god called Quetzalcoa
    8·2 answers
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following European nations would be least likely to share the characteristics Stannard uses to describe Columbus? A
    6·1 answer
  • Please help me with the following and only answer if you know the answer for sure
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!