1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mama L [17]
3 years ago
5

Why do you think hitler was so successful in mobilizing other to follow him? what were his main goals and how did he plan to ach

ieve them?
History
1 answer:
aivan3 [116]3 years ago
7 0
He gave his kin trust after they had lost everything and had little any expectation of regularly coming back to commonality. His principle objectives were to make Germany the most intense nation on the planet and to make a "flawless country"; he intended to do this by making uncommon organizations together and moving rapidly
You might be interested in
Consider Hermann Goering's behavior at the trial. Why did he behave the way he did and how does that play into his eventual suic
Svetach [21]
I'll answer in a second(:
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
kiruha [24]

I think the theory was global warming because the weather suddenly changed

4 0
2 years ago
Read the quote from NATO’s first Secretary General. [Our goal] is to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans do
Anastasy [175]

keep the Russians from taking over Europe. just too the test and passed

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Independent regulatory agencies are bureaucratic units developed in response to
Pavel [41]

If the independent agency exercises any type of executive powers such as imposition or enforcement (and most of them do), Congress can not participate in the process of habitual dismissal of the commissioners. Constitutionally, Congress can only participate directly in impeachment proceedings. The Congress may, however, pass statutes that limit the circumstances under which the President may dismiss the commissioners of the independent agencies. Members of Congress can not serve as commissioners on independent agencies that hold executive powers, nor can Congress appoint commissioners, the Constitution Appointment Clause confers that power on the President. The Senate can participate, however, in appointments through "advice and consent", which occurs through confirmation hearings and votes on candidates of the President.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is America a land of liberty ? Why?
Alex Ar [27]
NO OTHER country puts as much emphasis on “freedom” as the United States. Patrick Henry demanded “liberty or death”. The national anthem calls America “the land of the free”. Great reformers from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King have urged America to live up to its ideal of “freedom”. When a group of French Americanophiles wanted to flatter the United States, they sent the Statue of Liberty.

And no other country boasts as much about its mission to give freedom to the rest of the world. Woodrow Wilson thought that he had a God-given duty to bring liberty to mankind. George Bush regards his foreign policy as a crusade for freedom—“the right and hope of all humanity”.

But how good is America at living up to its own ideals? A new study by Freedom House tries to answer this question. The fact that Freedom House has devoted so much attention to the United States is significant in its own right. Founded in 1941 by a group of Americans who were worried about the advance of fascism, Freedom House is now the world's leading watchdog of liberty. The fact that “Today's American: How Free?” is such a thorough piece of work makes it doubly significant.

The judicious tone of “How Free?” will undoubtedly disappoint leftists. Freedom House bends over backwards to give the authorities the benefit of the doubt. Other countries have recalibrated the balance between freedom and security in the face of terrorists who want to inflict mass casualties on civilians. America's recent sins, however, are minor compared with those of its past. Newspapers have published highly sensitive information without reprisals. Congress and the courts have repeatedly stepped in to restore a more desirable constitutional balance.

But the verdict on the Bush years is nevertheless sharp. “How Free?” not only details and condemns the administration's familiar sins, from Guantánamo to extraordinary rendition to warrantless wiretapping. It reminds readers of its aversion to open government. The number of documents classified as secret has jumped from 8.7m in 2001 to 14.2m in 2005—a 60% increase over three years. Decade-old information has been reclassified. Researchers report that it is much more difficult and time-consuming to obtain information under the Freedom of Information Act.

Government whistleblowers have repeatedly been punished or fired—even when they have been trying to expose threats to national security that their bosses preferred to overlook. Richard Levernier had his security clearance revoked for revealing that some of the country's nuclear facilities were not properly secured. Border security agents have been punished for pointing out that the border is inadequately monitored, and airport baggage-handlers and security people for pointing to weaknesses in the security system. The Office of Special Counsel, which was established to enforce laws designed to protect the rights of such people, is widely regarded as “inept and even hostile to whistleblowers”.

“How Free?” also has some hard things to say about America's criminal-justice system. The incarceration rate exploded from 1.39 per 1,000 in 1980 to 7.5 in 2006, driven, among other things, by the war on drugs. America now has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world: 5.6m Americans, or one in every 37 adults, has spent time behind bars. Even though prison-building is one of the country's great growth industries, overcrowding is endemic, with federal prisons operating at 131% of capacity. America is also one of the few countries to ban felons and, in some states, ex-felons from voting. At any one time 4m Americans—one in every 50 adults—is disenfranchised because of past criminal convictions. This includes 1.4m blacks, or 14% of the black male population.

Freedom House's strictures are, if anything, too soft. America insists on criminalising victimless crimes such as prostitution. Last week Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called DC Madam, committed suicide; the government had thrown the book at her, including racketeering and mail fraud, because it really wished to penalise the arranging of assignations between consenting adults. In her suicide note to her mother she wrote that she could not “live the next six-to-eight years behind bars for what you and I have both come to regard as this 'modern-day lynching'.”

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the general outlines of Nixon's economic policy. Was it consistent? Was it effective?
    15·1 answer
  • Who is benjamin franklin
    10·2 answers
  • Why were the colonists angry about British officers using writs of assistance
    10·1 answer
  • Which best describes a major characteristic of islam?
    7·1 answer
  • Where were the first extensive farming villages found
    11·2 answers
  • In which regions was the Aztec civilization located?
    7·1 answer
  •   During the late nineteenth century, industries such as oil and steel were growing rapidly. Some business owners hoped to take
    7·2 answers
  • What were the major differences between the Great Depression and the Great Recession?
    6·1 answer
  • Please helppppp!!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • What were the effects of the war on Greece Thermopylae
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!