The statement above is most closely related to
neocolonialism.
Neocolonialism<span>, </span>neo-colonialism<span> or
neo-imperialism is the geopolitical practice of using capitalism, business
globalization, and cultural imperialism to influence a country, in lieu of
either direct military control (imperialism) or indirect political control
(hegemony).</span>
The correct answer between all
the choices given is the second choice or letter B. I am hoping that this
answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your
endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.
From the beginning, Great Britain had most of the advantages in the Revolutionary War. They had better guns, better troops, and better leaders. The only advantage the colonists had was that they knew the land and how to exploit it for their benefit, like Swamp Fox. Winning the support of the French brought more guns and troops, and leaders like Lafayette and Rochambeau. During the seize of Yorktown, Rochambeau sealed in the Redcoats, winning the war for the colonists.
It could sail against the wind
<span>A stance that supports a particular interpretation of history is known as B. a historical argument. This is when you choose what to believe in - history may be interpreted in many ways, and all of them can be either wrong or correct, but it is up to you to choose that analysis which you thing is the right one. That analysis will be called a historical argument, because you will provide others with arguments as to why that interpretation should be correct.</span>
Answer:
They Wanted to keep black from voting because they would vote for the republicans which would take the slaves and with the majority of the population in the south being slaves the republicans would have won.
Explanation:
