1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dsp73
3 years ago
14

What event led directly to the formation of the warshaw pact

History
2 answers:
Basile [38]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The event that led directly to the formation of the Warsaw Pact was the creation of NATO in 1949.

Explanation:

The Treaty of Friendship, Collaboration and Mutual Assistance, better known as the Warsaw Pact for the city in which it was signed, was a military cooperation agreement signed on May 14, 1955 by the countries of the Eastern Bloc. Designed under the leadership of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), its express objective was to counteract the threat of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and in particular the rearmament of the German Federal Republic, to which the Agreements of Paris allowed to reorganize their armed forces.

shusha [124]3 years ago
3 0

After World War 2, The Warsaw Pact was formed. hope that helped.


You might be interested in
What document did The Second Continental Congress established
RUDIKE [14]
The Declaration of Independence
5 0
3 years ago
The statement of purpose of the Declaration of Independence is called the?
Llana [10]

The correct answer is the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence.

The Preamble is the Executive overview of the Declaration and states the general philosophy behind the separation.

Written primarily by Thomas Jefferson, it states:

When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

2.1 We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

2.2 That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

2.3 Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

2.4 But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.

2.5 Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these States. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

4 0
3 years ago
The difference between education in Sumer and the U.S
Vinvika [58]

Answer:

kindly check the explanation section.

Explanation:

Education, they say is the best legacies and many countries in the world are striving to have a better education system. The education in Sumer, which is known [presently as the Southern Iraq] has education  system which is different from the one in the United States of America. Few of the difference in the education of Sumer and U.S is given given below as:

<em>=> English Language is been taught as the first language in the United States while English language is been taught as the second language in Sumer. </em>

<em />

<em>=> The violence going on in Sumer affects the quality of education as safety as to be chosen over education. This is not the  case in the United States as there is high level of peace. </em>

<em />

<em>=> Tuition is free in public universities in Sumer while it is not in the United States. </em>

8 0
3 years ago
A search engine is giving you too many sites that are not relevant to your topic, how cell phones change culture. Placing quotes
bekas [8.4K]
-Change your wording

-“Cell phones change culture by *l”
(Search it that way)

-use a different engine

-try searching within certain websites

ILL HELP MORE IN COMMENTS IF NONE OF THESE WORK


I’ll appreciate brainlyest
3 0
2 years ago
What is the cost and impact of the Civil War?
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

The first and most important point is that the Civil War was expensive. In 1860 the U.S. national debt was $65 million. To put that in perspective, the national debt in 1789, the year George Washington took office, was $77 million. In other words, from 1789 to 1860, the United States spanned the continent, fought two major wars, and began its industrial growth—all the while reducing its national debt.We had limited government, few federal expenses, and low taxes. In 1860, on the eve of war, almost all federal revenue derived from the tariff. We had no income tax, no estate tax, and no excise taxes. Even the hated whiskey tax was gone. We had seemingly fulfilled Thomas Jefferson’s vision: “What farmer, what mechanic, what laborer ever sees a tax-gatherer of the United States?”Four years of civil war changed all that forever. In 1865 the national debt stood at $2.7 billion. Just the annual interest on that debt was more than twice our entire national budget in 1860. In fact, that Civil War debt is almost twice what the federal government spent before 1860.What’s worse, Jefferson’s vision had become a nightmare. The United States had a progressive income tax, an estate tax, and excise taxes as well. The revenue department had greatly expanded, and tax-gatherers were a big part of the federal bureaucracy.

Furthermore, our currency was tainted. The Union government had issued more than $430 million in paper money (greenbacks) and demanded it be legal tender for all debts. No gold backed the notes.The military side of the Civil War ended when Generals Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee shook hands at Appomattox Court House. But the economic side of the war endured for generations. The change is seen in the annual budgets before and after the war. The 1860 federal budget was $63 million, but after the war, annual budgets regularly exceeded $300 million. Why the sharp increase?

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was sejong an unusual choice for king
    5·1 answer
  • Booker T. Washington and W.E.B Du Bois were:
    8·1 answer
  • Which heading best completes the partial outline below?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the victory garden?
    15·1 answer
  • What were the seven east european soviet satellite countries?
    9·1 answer
  • Put the events in the correct order from first to last stamp act,
    10·1 answer
  • The community Reinvestment Act of 1977 succeeded in
    15·2 answers
  • In which ways did the Caddo resemble southeast tribes?
    14·1 answer
  • What happens to powers in the U.S. Constitution not reserved for the federal government? They are reserved for the states and th
    14·1 answer
  • This image represents the Texas Revolution, what was the result of this battle(A. with this battle Texans declared they wanted t
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!