Fallacies of Relevanceappeal to evidence or examples that are not relevant to the argument at handFallacies of Ambiguity<span>ambiguous words/phrases that can have double meanings
ex: "war on poverty" war- not actually going to battle</span>Component Fallacies<span>anything that happened after an event is caused by said event
ex: I walked under a latter yesterday, and today I broke my leg- walking under latter did not cause your leg to break</span>Fallacies of Omission<span>These errors occur because the logician leaves out necessary material in an argument or misdirects others from missing information
</span>
Answer: C
Explanation:
He thought it was powerful and advanced because of the passion of the reading
An author should support his arguments by listing statistics and including historical facts.
A strong argument is a non deductive argument that gives logical reasoning to the statement made. This conclusion is probable but not conclusive.
A strong argument is backed by:
- Related statistical facts : Statistical facts are certain numbers and figures which are derived after complete study and research on a particular topic.
- Historical facts: These are the facts which are derived from historical events and remains.
- Previous researches
- Existing knowledge: The existing knowledge base adds to the strong argumentative side of the speaker.
Therefore, the two strategies the author uses to support the arguments are option (C) and (D).
Learn more about Arguments on brainly.com/question/3775579
#SPJ10
