2,4,1,3,5
_______
______
_____
___
__
_
Castro had too large of an army to fight the invaders.The United States failed to provide adequate support.The Soviet Union had provided too many modern weapons.Castro found out about the invasion before it occurred.
Explanation:
Answer:
Gather enough signatures on a petition.
Explanation:
One of the most effective ways to participate in direct democracy is to gather signatures on a petition, in order to have the petition in the ballot box.
This is direct democracy because it gives citizens the power to decide by themselvers, without the intermediation of representatives, whether they want or not to approve a particular measure.
Answer:
“I do think that if there were a long term—I don’t know, 18, 20 years, something like that, and it was fixed—I would say that was fine. In fact, it’d make my life a lot simpler, to tell you the truth.” – Justice Stephen Breyer1
“The Framers adopted life tenure at a time when people simply did not live as long as they do now. A judge insulated from the normal currents of life for twenty-five or thirty years was a rarity then, but is becoming commonplace today. Setting a term of, say, fifteen years would ensure that federal judges would not lose all touch with reality through decades of ivory tower existence. It would also provide a more regular and greater degree of turnover among the judges. Both developments would, in my view, be healthy ones.” – Future Chief Justice John Roberts2
The rules governing the U.S. Supreme Court must be updated to reflect the reality of life in modern America. The average tenure of a Supreme Court justice has significantly lengthened since the establishment of the federal judiciary in the 1700s, giving outsize power to nine individuals in a way the framers of the Constitution could never have imagined. This longevity has resulted in a lack of regularity in vacancies, introducing further randomness to the judicial selection process. As a result, the confirmation process for the highest court has become politically divisive, with extremely narrow votes and theatrics from the nominees themselves. This state of affairs is untenable; policymakers must address it by enacting legislation to create term limits for justices.
