Answer:
Pros of Mandatory Voting
Mandatory Voting Would Increase Voter Turnout
Compulsory Voting Would Change Campaigning for the Better
Compulsory Voting Would Encourage Engagement in the Political Process
Compulsory Voting Would Discourage Voter Suppression
Cons of Mandatory Voting
Compulsory Voting Would Encourage an Uninformed Electorate
Compulsory Voting Would Hamper Freedom of Choice
It would be a burden to law enforcement
Compulsory Voting Could Infringe on Religious Rights
Explanation:
Mandatory voting requires some countries with eligible citizens to register and vote in elections. In the United States, voting is not mandatory; it is a freedom that citizens of the US have stated in the Constitution.
Answer:
I would guess D
Explanation:
It makes the most sense (i have no proof that its the right answer just a gut feeling ¯\(°_o)/¯
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "a. the New York Times." The Times appealed the decision to the United States Supreme Court. The Court ruled against Sullivan and in favor of the New York Times."<span>
</span>
<span>In general (according to Russia's early histories), the ancestors of Russian people were almost from the Pripet Marshes. It was a vast natural region from the wetlands. People or tribe from this place were called Slavic.Despite of many variety of people from several nations, the Slavic were the first people to settle in Russia and Ukraine. the answer is the choice B:slavics.</span>
One only true statement regarding the Compromise of 1850 (which was actually a batch of five different bills) that is true would be that "<span>A. the slave trade was abolished in the district of Columbia," since this was a crucial northern provision. It should be noted, however, that slavery itself in this region was not completely ended. </span>
