The French Revolution and American Revolution were the instances of civilians rebelling against their government. The French rebelled against their government in a violent manner, as did the Americans.
Similarities : - The French Revolution and American Revolution are similar. They are similar because the people who rebelled were ordinary citizens taking up arms and attacking their governments. This is significant because both revolutions had this connection. In the same manner, the muskets and artillery were used to attack each other into submission. The people no longer marched in blasting away at each other. In comparison, the first instances of declaring independence were used, not seen in the magnitude that they were declared in before. That shows that the two revolutions are the same.
Differences : - The American Revolution and French Revolution have differences as well. One of them is the fact that the American's had warships and the French rebels did not. This is significant because the French rebels did not have a navy as the Americans had a navy. In contrast to the similarities between the French Revolution and American Revolutions, the Americans were a colony that rebelled against their own government. This is significant because the American colonists probably had more time to prepare for an invasion and as an addition to, the country of Britain was far away from America. In spite of all the similarities, the American Colonists had uniforms and the French did not.
Hope this helps!
They became better organize because they could divide work more officially
Roman Republic doesn't have a separate Judicial Branch it's included in an other branch.
In Rome the people that run Rome are called consuls and there are 2.Also they only serve for 1 year but in US there is 1 president and he serves 1 or 2 4 year terms
No, because anything could happen he could be killed or the horses die.
Answer:
Zinn, probably America’s most famous radical historian, gives his, in many ways different from most traditional ideas, look at the most important events in US history from colonial times to the beginning of the 21st century. The author created an unusually vivid, lively, full of interesting facts history of life and the struggle for the survival and dignity of disadvantaged social groups. Zinn himself called his political views being at the crossroads of democratic socialism and anarchism, and used the Marxist methodology in his scientific works. In contrast to the official version of “the history of presidents and generals,” Zinn draws attention to those aspects that are not always adequately covered by the mainstream of American historical science: class struggle, American expansionism, Indian genocide, Black rebellions against slavery, the situation of workers, women and African Americans.
Explanation: