In the Declaration of Sentiments, wrote by Elizabeth Stanton and Lucretia Mott for the Seneca Falls Women´s Rights Convention in 1848, some the rhetorical features were used I order to convey the ideas of the inequality of rights between men and women and the oppression women suffered by men. In these lines those features were Arrangement, because it was structured as a list, been clear and easy to internalize, Style that as the structure influences in the way people will receive the information, and, finally, Memory, seen on the repetition of the oppression idea reiterated in each sentence beginning with “He has…” to emphasize men oppressive behavior.
The story revolves around racial segregation. The line which gives us an idea that it took place a long ago are: Shingled rooms of houses, cordwood split by the chopping block.
<h3>What is the idea behind Lizzie Bright and the Buckminster Boy story?</h3>
The book revolves around racial segregation, the bond of friendship, intolerance, the process of growing up, and religion. the main theme of the book goes beyond the teaching of the church.
The lines that show the story falls a long ago are:
- Shingled rooms of houses clamped themselves to the rocks
- dory was in front of almost all of them
- cordwood split by the chopping block.
Therefore the above explanation aptly describes the statements.
Learn more about Lizzie Bright and the Buckminster Boy here:
brainly.com/question/3348538
Answer:
A tale of anger and forgiveness from the congo.
Question:
"<em>These natural laws are incontrovertible; . . . Those who resist them will be wiped out. Biology not only tells us about animals and plants, but also shows us the laws we must follow in our lives, and steels our wills to live and fight according to these laws. The meaning of all life is struggle.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>The excerpt above is an example of a false dilemma. Which of the following choices explains the logical fallacy in this excerpt, as well as the reason it fails to prove its point?"</em>
I think your answer would be:
- D. The excerpt contains no logical fallacies but uses true statements to persuade the audience of life’s common struggle.
There is a slight error in the title of this question :)
Instead of ‘if my dad would let me’, it’s ‘had my dad let me (remember this useful phrase ending). This is because you can’t have a double ‘would’ in the same phrase.
