B. Proud
The king acts like he is very proud in "Ozymandias"
The quote that clearly shows that Sagoyewatha is determined not to sell the land is "They bought them, piece after piece, for a little money paid to a few men in our nation, and not to all our brethren . . ."
<h3>How does this quote present Sagoyewatha's thinking?</h3>
- It shows that the sale of land is not profitable.
- It shows that the money received is not enough to make everyone happy.
- It shows that the money would not be shared equally.
Sagoyewatha shows that the sale of land is disadvantageous, as it will cause the people to lose a very precious asset and receive little money, which will not be able to compensate them for the lack of land.
He also claims that the profits from this sale are not evenly distributed, leaving some community members in a very bad situation as they will be left without money and land.
Learn more about Sagoyewatha:
brainly.com/question/27972400
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. anecdotal, because it tells a narrative about enslaved people taking action for basic human rights.
Explanation:
Passage:
<em>The seeds for this system were sown in 1823 in the sugar colony of British Guiana—now Guyana—where John Gladstone, father of the future British prime minister William Gladstone, owned over a thousand slaves. John Smith, a young and idealistic English preacher who had recently come to the area, was becoming popular with those slaves. His inspiring sermons retold the story of Moses leading the Jews out of Egypt and to freedom. The sugar workers listened and understood: Smith was speaking not about the Bible, but about the present. That summer, after hearing one of Smith’s sermons, over three thousand slaves grabbed their machetes, their long poles, and rose up against their masters. The governor of the colony rushed toward the burning plantations, where he met a group of armed slaves, and asked them what they wanted.</em>
<em />
<em>"Our rights," came the reply. Here was Haiti—and for that matter America and France—all over again. The slaves insisted they were not property; like the Jews in Egypt, they were God's children, who were owed their basic human rights.</em>
This is a narrative.