1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tamiku [17]
2 years ago
15

Which country is not parliamentary democracy

History
1 answer:
velikii [3]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:   However, most democracies in the world today use the parliamentary system as opposed to a presidential system like that used in the United States. A few examples among the many parliamentary democracies are Canada, Great Britain, Italy, Japan, Latvia, the Netherlands, and New Zealand.

Explanation: Hope It Helps you !?

You might be interested in
Which was a main cause of race riots in American cities?
Alika [10]

The correct option is D. All of the above.

The main causes of race riots in American cities include police conduct, ghetto conditions and unemployment.

According to information from Justice Department, one in three African-Americans will spend some time of their life in jail.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Father Miguel Hidalgo is called the "Father of Mexican Independence" because he
disa [49]
C. is your answer there you go
4 0
3 years ago
What were the key accomplishments during FDR First hundred days
nirvana33 [79]
In Roosevelt's first hundred days in office, he pushed 15 major bills through Congress. The bills would reshape every aspect of the economy, from banking and industry to agriculture and social welfare. The president promised decisive action.
3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME I DON’T UNDERSTAND AND NEED HELP!!!!
sp2606 [1]

You can either talk about police, education (school), highway building, or how taxes are used to pay for all those services. And then explain how whatever service you chose affects your family. Like for example, highway building can cause you or your parents to have to leave earlier because of detours. Or with taxes you can talk about how it puts your family on a budget.

5 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast Hobbes’ and Locke’s views of human nature and the role government should play
svet-max [94.6K]

Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another.  This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.

John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience.  Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.

Further explanation:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em>  in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Did the American anti-slavery society want to send free African Americans to Africa to start new colonies
    7·1 answer
  • If a President receives a bill that has some provisions he or she supports and some provisions he or she opposes, the President
    11·2 answers
  • How was the Scientific Revolution a threat to the Church?
    14·1 answer
  • 3. Why was there conflict between the Romans and the Jews
    8·2 answers
  • How did the bill of rights influence the US constitution
    9·2 answers
  • How did Mesopotamia change the nomadic way of life
    15·1 answer
  • How was Brazil's adoption of independence different from other parts of South America? A. It was more violent. B. It was gained
    8·1 answer
  • NEED HELP ASAP :,)
    10·1 answer
  • Which empire is describe the following (i didn’t mean to click that one)
    9·1 answer
  • Certain politicians asserted that African Americans
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!