Answer:
The correct answer is: Humanistic.
Explanation:
The humanistic perspective of personality stablishes that one of the main purposes of individuals is to fulfill their true potentials via self-actualization.
<u>Humanists like Rogers, Yalom and May believe that human beings reach true happiness when they are able to live meaningful lives by being who they trully are.</u>
<u>Rogers in particular says that human beings are inherently good and that their principal motivation is self-actualization.</u>
In this particular case, Carter believes that people are basically good and that each person will naturally strive to fulfill his or her unique potential.
Carter's beliefs reflect the humanistic perspective of personality.
The correct answer would be, Direct Influence.
When Erin and Brooke willingly comply, their parents are likely to be warm and gentle in the future. This is an example of a Direct Influence between parents and their children.
Explanation:
When children comply, it means they are acting in accordance with a wish or command of someone. So when children comply with their parents, it means they are acting according to their parents' wish and command.
When children act according to their parents wish and command, the parents are likely to be given a warm and gentle treatment to their children in the future. This is the example of direct influence, which tells us that parents commanded their children, to which the children comply, and then parents treat them gently and warmly. This is the direct influence between both parties.
Learn more about direct influence at:
brainly.com/question/1879333
#LearnWithBrainly
Mencius' political philosophy basically results from an extension of his doctrine of moral feelings. As he told the rulers, “If you let people follow their feelings (original nature), they will be able to do good” (Mencius 6A6). When Xunzi later attacked Mencius, one of his arguments was based on the concept of natural feelings.
The first session of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution reads as follows:
<em>"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside. the United States, nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws ".
</em>
The language of the Constitution is very clear. Every citizen born or naturalized in the United States has the right to jurisdiction. That is, in the national territory, these people have the right to legal immunity, must enjoy freedom, property and due process of law.
In this way, states can not deny any of these groups nor withdraw their rights if there is no crime and the resulting conviction.
