What structures are you talking about?
Answer:
Proactive interference.
Explanation:
What the exercise is exemplifying about is "Proactive interference" which is, as it's name indicates, an interference of our memory. When we are looking for a particular word, moment, etc., using our memory, sometimes we find a newer memory that intereferes, that confuses us for a moment. This is what is called proactive interference, and a very good example of that is what occurs to Deanna: she studied Spanish in high school and now, probably years later, she studies French. But, when attempting to do so, she confuses some words with Spanish words.
Answer:
common law
Explanation:
When good samaritan law does not apply in a certain state, the common law tends to dictate that a person cannot be held liable to the negative results of an accident as long as that person is not directly involved or hindering the helping process.
Even though Kathy's behavior is morally wrong, she's most likely wouldn't receive legal punishment. That's being said, She might receive social punishment (such as backlash from other people who knows about the case)
