Comparing ethics to morals

English

2 answers:

nikitadnepr [17]3 years ago

5 0

Explanation:

Ethics: standards of "good and bad" established by a certain community or social setting

Morals: something that is personal and normative, usually influenced by "good and bad" behaviors

notka56 [123]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

While they're closely related concepts, morals refer mainly to guiding principles, and ethics refer to specific rules and actions, or behaviors. A moral precept is an idea or opinion that's driven by a desire to be good. An ethical code is a set of rules that defines allowable actions or correct behavior.

Explanation:

Hope this Helps...

You might be interested in

In this, the second stanza of the poem, what does the speaker mean when he refers to his "fears,' 'tears," "smiles,' and 'wiles"

Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

What the speaker means in the second stanza is:

B) These are the metaphorical methods with which he feeds his hatred.

Explanation:

This question refers to the poem "A Poison Tree", by William Blake. The poem revolves around the speaker's wrath against his enemy.

In the second stanza, the speaker metaphorically describes how he feeds his hatred:

And I waterd it in fears,

Night & morning with my tears:

And I sunned it with smiles,

And with soft deceitful wiles.

Here, the speaker compares his wrath to a plant, which he waters with his tears. Plants also need sunshine to grow, which is given by the speaker in the form of smiles and deceitful wiles. The speaker is revealing the duplicity of his behavior and personality. He smiles at his foe, deceiving him into believing that everything is OK between them. All the while, however, he keeps on feeding his hatred. Eventually, it will grow into a poison tree and will kill the speaker's enemy.

8 0

3 years ago

Research and define the following historical figures upon which Shakespeare bases his fictionalized characters in Macbeth.

Mashcka [7]

Witches is the correct answer

7 0

3 years ago

Part A

Vladimir79 [104]

Part A: The correct answer is first statement. The major theme of “Harrison Bergeron” written by Kurt Vonnegut is that close-minded people are a threat to beauty, individuality, and self-expression. In this short story, Kurt wanted to present that total equality isn’t always good by creating a dystopia in which, to achieve equality, close-minded people are targeting intelligent, strong and beautiful people and strip them of their extraordinary characteristics. Those who represent individualism are being handicapped by Handicapper General so that others won’t feel inferior.

Part B: Evidence from the text that best represents answer in part A is the second one. By describing how hard government is working to make everyone equal, Vonnegut is directing reader’s attention on the concept of dystopian society to show how cruel it can be on those with “extraordinary characteristics”. Close-minded people feel inferior to individualists and by trying to be equal to them they treat their beauty, intelligence and strength, instead of trying to achieve more.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

But on the spot I told them: 'Back, and quickly! Out to sea again!' My men were mutinous, fools, on stores of wine. Sheep after

liq [111]

this is a really simple awnser but nobody gets it right it is 3 4 and 5

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The three main parts of an outline are main ideas, details, and _____.

LenaWriter [7]

C, subpoints. Hoped I helped!