<span>As in any era where reforms happen, there are winners, and losers.
The rich, Big Business benefit the most, while the middle and lower classes benefit the least
The unions benefit in that more people are wont to join for the protection they offer, and for a fair deal.
Consumers may benefit in the short term, however as we see, prices always go up, and quality always go down.
Women, Children, and the African Americans are the least groups to benefit, or were many years ago, as they had no real champions for their cause.
Hope this helps!!!!</span>
Answer:
the Monro doctrine was a statement saying if you attack any of our neighbors and wish them harm we will defend them this was a statement used to say hey america over here we putting our foot down and saying no to colonialism this also kicked of the war of 1812
In <em>Omar Khayyam's "RUBAIYAT OF OMAR KHAYYAM," Edward Fitzgerald </em>noted that pupils of Imam Mowaffak believed that they would all become fabulously rich in this world.
But since there is no certainty in this, the author asks what becomes of the fate of those who could not attain wealthy statuses, despite their strong belief.
Thus, the word<em> "ours" </em>in the first line of the poem refers to the pupils who may fail to become rich, notwithstanding that they <em>strongly believed and hoped</em> for their teacher's lessons to become real in their lives.
Related link: brainly.com/question/17948484
Based on my information, I believe that the higher authorities that would choose the prime ministers would actually be the "house of commons". Going back a few years, many of the "house of commons" actually did not have the responsibility in order to do this, but then, the government figured that it would be better if they were to handle on this responsibility.
