Potlatch, ceremonial distribution of property and gifts to affirm or reaffirm social status, as uniquely institutionalized by the American Indians of the Northwest Pacific coast. The potlatch reached its most elaborate development among the southern Kwakiutl from 1849 to 1925. Although each group had its characteristic version, the potlatch had certain general features. Ceremonial formalities were observed in inviting guests, in speechmaking, and in the distribution of goods by the donor according to the social rank of the recipients. The size of the gatherings reflected the rank of the donor. Great feasts and generous hospitality accompanied the potlatch, and the efforts of the kin group of the host were exerted to maximize the generosity. The proceedings gave wide publicity to the social status of donor and recipients because there were many witnesses.
Answer:
Conflict theorists and functionalists.
Explanation:
Conflict theorists:
Conflict theory is the perspective of social psychologists. It worked on the method of analysis. It is a critical comment on social arrangements of the society Conflict theories are attracting the attention of the power of differentials and this type of conflict found in the class called class conflicts.
Functionalist:
This is also called a functionalist perspective. It is Emile Durkheim's perspective. She was interested in the order of the society and stability of society.
They are called supporting ideas<span> because they "</span>support<span>" the topic sentence. Our TOEFL </span>essay's supporting ideas<span> all come after the topic sentences. They </span>support the topic sentence by telling the reader why we believe the topic sentence is true.Supporting ideas<span> can be almost anything. </span>Once you have decided on your topic and your main controlling idea, you need to choose the two, three, or four supporting points about the topic. The topic is what the paragraph or essay is about, the supporting points<span> are the most important things you have to say about your topic.
</span>
Yes, i believe Vandivier was right to do the whistle blow.
Since the company where he works basically forced him to do their scheme in frauding the government, i personally believe he is morally required to do so because taxpayers are the one that would receive the impact.
