Lets x = # of hours Melania works at <span>office clerk
and y = </span># of hours Melania works as a <span>cashier
x + y = 38 so x = 38 - y
13x + 9.25y = 434
substitute </span> x = 38 - y into 13x + 9.25y = 434
13x + 9.25y = 434
13(38 - y) + 9.25y = 434
494 - 13y + 9.25y = 434
-3.75y = -60
y = 16
x = 38 - y so x = 38 - 16 = 22
answer
Melania works at office clerk = 22 hours
Melania works as a cashier = 16 hours
Answer:
B, 6/2 and A
Step-by-step explanation:
The disk method will only involve a single integral. I've attached a sketch of the bounded region (in red) and one such disk made by revolving it around the y-axis.
Such a disk has radius x = 1/y and height/thickness ∆y, so that the volume of one such disk is
π (radius) (height) = π (1/y)² ∆y = π/y² ∆y
and the volume of a stack of n such disks is
where 
is a point sampled from the interval [1, 5].
As we refine the solid by adding increasingly more, increasingly thinner disks, so that ∆y converges to 0, the sum converges to a definite integral that gives the exact volume V,
The correct equation should look something like this:
y= -1x - 2
Consider the equation for a line:
y = mx + b,
Where ‘m’ is the slope
Where ‘b’ is the y-intercept.
From there you can plug in your known values for ‘m’ and ‘b’, and get the equation above. If you are still not convinced, I suggest you graph the function and observe its slope and y-intercept.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
No I do not agree with Andre says that 3 divided by 2/3 Solving for 3 ÷ 2/3
3 ÷ 2/3
= 3 × 3/2
= 9/2
= 4 1/2
Therefore, 3 divided by 2/3 is 4 1/2
Andre's reasoning is wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is incorrect
Let's divide and compare the sum
3 : 2/3 = 3*3/2 = 9/2 = 4 1/2
and
There are four 2/3 fractions and one 1/3 fraction
The 1/3 fraction is 1/2 of 2/3 fraction so instead of counting 1/3 as 1/3 it should be counted as 1/2
