In the Scott v. Sandford case, Sandford's argument was based on the Missouri Compromise.
Answer: the desire's and interest of other people are not ours to control because of the freedom of speech and promoting a free country such as the united states we the people have a right to vote as well as a right to have an opinion and a right to think for ourselves therefor nobody, i said Nobody have the right to tell me how to think or solve problems nor should they tell me how to react to anything.
i would appreciate the brainliest and hope this helps
Answer: They both owned major companies that monopolized their respective industries and crushed all competition. They were both philanthropists too and they both used railroads to keep their prices low.
Explanation:
