Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
i think d is the correct answer
In the market for personal computers, we would expect the Equilibrium quantity to rise and the change in the equilibrium price to be ambiguous.
<h3>
What is equilibrium quantity?</h3>
- When there is no shortage or surplus of a product on the market, it is said to be in equilibrium quantity.
- When supply and demand meet, the amount of an item that consumers want to buy equals the amount supplied by its producers.
- The equilibrium price is the only price at which consumers' and producers' plans coincide—that is, the amount consumers want to buy of the product, quantity demanded, equals the amount producers want to sell, quantity supplied.
- Assume there is an increase in both supply and demand for personal computers.
- The Equilibrium quantity would then rise in the market for personal computers, while the change in the equilibrium price would be ambiguous.
Therefore, in the market for personal computers, we would expect the equilibrium quantity to rise and the change in the equilibrium price to be ambiguous.
Know more about equilibrium quantity here:
brainly.com/question/22569960
#SPJ4
The correct question is given below:
Suppose there is an increase in both the supply and demand for personal computers. In the market for personal computers, we would expect the Equilibrium quantity to ______ and the change in the equilibrium price to be __________
Answer:d) give the company its own identity. explain "where we are headed.
Explanation: A company's mission statement is a statement that specifically highlights the following
(1) The needs of the customer which the company plans to fulfill.
(2) Highlight the company's products and services which are rendered.
(3) It should also identify the Customer or market it is trying to reach.
This is what a good mission statement should be, The mission statement is different from the vision statement which tends to highlight where the company is heading to in the future.
Explanation:
The business market is constantly changing, currently we are dealing with a technological revolution that directly affects the lives of people and companies. The market is increasingly competitive and globalized, so adapting to new processes and innovations with regard to technology, administrative practices and communication are essential when it comes to managing companies.
A good leader must understand that currently companies are increasingly responsible for their micro and macro environment, which configures them as active agents for positive change in the world. Therefore, the ideal is that managers consider adopting current practices that use modern communication and intelligence systems to make work easier and more agile, in addition to promoting continuous improvement in all organizational processes, avoiding waste and negative impacts on the environment, establishing social programs and environmental protection practices, in order to attest its value to stakeholders.
It is also necessary that the company be ethical with its employees, respect the individual values of each with regard to culture, gender, etc., promoting an environment and organizational culture focused on inclusion and respect for differences.
The ideal is also to have an assertive leadership, where the leader is the personal incentive agent, adopting positive attitudes about its collaborators and helping in the personal and professional development, generating an innovative, ethical and positive environment.
