I would say they both lived in Middle America.
Answer:
Positive producer incentive : making more profit
Negative producer incentive : High manufacturing cost
Positive consumer incentive : reduction in sales price
Negative consumer incentive : Price increase
Explanation:
Incentives may be described as actions which are used to either motivate, entice both producers or consumers. This type of incentives are usually classed as positive.
Incentives may be either positive or negative. Negative incentive may be regarded as actions which may lead a market forces from refraining from a certain action or activity.
Negative consumer incentive will look to ward off consumers from making a purchase. E. G
Price increase
Positive consumer incentive will entice and motivate consumer into making a purchase. E. G reduction in sales price
Positive producer incentive will seem to increase producer's profit and improve efficiency of production E. G Making more money
Negative producer incentive will seem to place extra burden and heighten production cost E. G
High manufacturing cost
Answer:
a, b jus trust me who's class are you in I might be in here too
I believe it is the judicial branch.
Answer:
The cases were about racial segregation.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education(1954) was a Supreme Court case which ruled that children's racial segregation in government's schools was illegal. The decision by the Supreme court showed that everyone is equal despite their colour or religion.
Milliken v. Bradley(1974) was a Supreme Court case in the United States regarding the outlined desegregation of busing among public school students in Detroit. There was a plan to blend students of different races in United States public schools following the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). The decision was the opposite of the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education as segregation was encouraged.
The court refused to remedy unequal and separate education. Children need to learn together and understand each other. I believe voters who disagreed with the ruling could have made a peaceful protest regarding the decision made. Also, since the public schools were mainly funded by taxes, the people who opposed the decision could have refused to pay tax in order to voice their opinions on the issues.
