The Gibbons v. Ogden case is a 1824 precedent of the United States Supreme Court, that gave Congress the control of interstate commerce.
Under a state law, New York State had granted Livingston and Fulton exclusive rights to use and navigate all waterways in the state. Gibbons arbitrarily initiated a passenger transport business between New York State and New Jersey, and Ogden sued Gibbons in violation of his exclusive business right.
Gibbons operated a steamer that ran between New York State and New Jersey State. Because of this, the restrictive regulations imposed by the State of New York were harmful to him. He argued then that it was a power of the Congress to control trade when several states were involved, so the decision of the State of New York went against this precept. The Supreme Court established that, indeed, it was the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce and that the law of the State of New York was in violation of federal antitrust laws that prohibited monopoly.
The correct answer is A.
During the late 1800's, America production was increasing greatly due to the development of interchangeable parts. Now that many businesses were able to mass produce goods, they needed buyers to consume them to ensure that the price of the goods did not decrease.
America wasn't worried about the spread of communism or the need for immigrant workers until the 20th century (hence why B and D are wrong).
Answer: The opposite of the principle of charity is the straw man. This happens when we intentionally misrepresent our opponent's position to argue against something we can easily defeat
Please restore ure question and then i can answer
The answer is <u>C. Encomiendas</u> because its a dependency relation system that started in Spain during the Roman Empire. It allows the strongest to protect the weakest in exchange of service.
