I think the answer would be E. Feudal Democracy
They created a democracy untainted by wealth, privileged birth or corruption where every (eligible) citizen can take part in politics/ assembly.
Answer:
The absence of armed fight against the mother country (Spain and Portugal), and the result of each independence.
Explanation:
The main characteristic of the independence movements of the Spanish colonies is that in almost all there was a war between the colonists and colonizers that dragged on for some years and ended with the victory of the colonists. It was like that in Chile, Uruguay, Argentina, and Bolivia. In Brazil, <u><em>there were several conflicts during the Independence process, but none directly influenced the Declaration of Independence.</em></u>
The main difference between the Independence movements of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile is the result achieved by each country. In Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, declarations of Independence took these countries directly to the republican regime, while <u><em>in Brazil there was only a political break with the metropolis maintaining the entire system that was in force during the colony.</em></u>
Answer:
Some truths are too difficult to fathom if one has not experienced them.
Explanation:
In <em>All Rivers Run To The Sea</em>, Elie Weisel talks about the horrors of the Holocaust that discriminated and annihilated millions of Jewish people. The detailed narration of the holocaust and it's outcome has been and still is one of the most famous genocide in the history of humanity.
The given excerpt from the book tells of how one is incapable of understanding the full extend of the sufferings the Jews faced during that period. He seems to suggest that some truths, even though painful and powerful they may be, are too difficult to fathom by anyone who has no experience of it. He rather stated <em>"Let the gas chambers remain closed to prying eyes, and to the imagination"</em>.
