I would say A because imported goods and raw materials went up in tax price
A) True, he won 41.4%
B) True, won 99 out of 261, over John Quincy Adams with 84.
C) True, John Quincy Adams did win the election of 1824, even if he did not win either the electoral vote or popular vote. Fun!
D) True, he was named secretary of state
E) Martin Van Buren was a vice presidential candidate not a presidential candidate.
B. Bolsheviks
“Under the rule of the Czars, Russia once tried (and failed miserably) to develop a sustainable middle class. That failure ultimately helped pave the way for the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.”
In the USA?
A major event for the Women’s Suffrage Crusade is 1848’s Seneca Falls Convention where prominent leaders of the movement (such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton) drafted a constitution very similar to the current country’s constitution with the addition of women being added with “all men are created equal”, etc.
In 1920 the 19th Amendment was passed which gave women the right to vote.
The women’s suffrage movement was kind of put on the back burner due to the rise of World War 1 (not saying women’s right to vote wasn’t important but it was a global war). However, WWI brought the issue back to light when men returned home to find that women had taken their jobs at factories, etc and didn’t want to be pushed back into the home.
At the time, there were women who believed that women’s suffrage would cause problems and therefore didn’t support it.
2020 was the 100th year anniversary of women’s suffrage.
I honestly don’t know a ton about in countries so sorry about that.
Answer:
The took it for themselves kind of.
Explanation:
On Aug. 19, 1953, elements inside Iran organized and funded by the Central Intelligence Agency and British intelligence services carried out a coup d’état that overthrew the government of Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. Historians have yet to reach a consensus on why the Eisenhower administration opted to use covert action in Iran, tending to either emphasize America’s fear of communism or its desire to control oil as the most important factor influencing the decision. Using recently declassified material, this article argues that growing fears of a “collapse” in Iran motivated the decision to remove Mossadegh. American policymakers believed that Iran could not survive without an agreement that would restart the flow of oil, something Mossadegh appeared unable to secure. There was widespread scepticism of his government’s ability to manage an “oil-less” economy, as well as fears that such a situation would lead inexorably to communist rule. A collapse narrative emerged to guide U.S. thinking, one that coalesced in early 1953 and convinced policymakers to adopt regime change as the only remaining option. Oil and communism both impacted the coup decision, but so did powerful notions of Iranian incapacity and a belief that only an intervention by the United States would save the country from a looming, though vaguely defined, calamity.
