Answer:
In the landmark U.S. v. New York Times case, the Court ruled that the government could not, through "prior restraint," block publication of any material unless it could prove that it would "surely" result in "direct, immediate, and irreparable" harm to the nation.
It is known as the Ballot initiative. The ballot initiative is a method by which a request of marked by a specific least number of enrolled voters can achieve an open vote on a proposed statute or protected revision.
<span>Ballot initiative may appear as either the immediate or backhanded activity. Under the immediate action, a measure is put specifically to a vote subsequent to being put together by an appeal.</span>
Answer and Explanation:
Teenagers should be allowed to drive from 18 years of age. This is because driving is an act of extreme responsibility, where the driver must be agile and must know how to make correct decisions in a serious and rational way. It is very difficult for young people under the age of 18 to have this degree of maturity, and it is favorable for them to avoid driving during this period. However, driving permits for 18-year-olds must have restrictions, such as having a high cognitive and psychological quality, not presenting criminal passages and strictly following traffic laws.
Regarding the most effective research questions for this prompt, those that are most appropriate are:
- Which laws are already in place that have restrictions for teenage drivers?
- Why are some people for or against raising the minimum driving age?
-
What do the data on accidents related to teen drivers reveal?
Answer:
a Self-fullfiling prophecy.
Explanation:
Self-fulfilling prophecies are psychological phenomena in which individuals predict an event, and due to their conscious or unconscious behavior, said event ends up happening.
For instance, Jim has a physics exam in two weeks. The exam is about thermodynamics, a topic that James dislikes because he doesn't understand it. After hearing the news that the exam was coming, he immediately claims that he was going to fail the exam. Out of resignation, he thinks: why bother studying, I'm not good at thermodynamics, and even though he may not realize it, he is setting himself up to fail. The day of the exam comes, and because he did not study one bit during the last two weeks, he loses the exam.
In this particular case, Marcus has a big wrestling match coming up, but he fears that he will lose. The week before the match, he claims that he is "really busy with other studies," and does not practice at all. Even though he may not realize he is doing this, he is setting himself up so that he will have an "excuse" in case he loses the match. Marcus is apparently engaging in a self-fullfilling prophecy.
