Answer:
hey can you try this link
Explanation:
I cannot send u the link so
can u copy and paste the question and in the first part click it
The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.
The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. Pittsburg Landing fit into the Northern strategy in fighting the war by the Union wanting to gain control of the tributaries that flowed into the Mississippi River.
Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
Constantine because there was a conference in 326
I think XMOJO is correct.
