Answer:
They have kept the country intact
Explanation:
I think this is a very interesting question. In my opinion, I think they have kept the country intact, look at it this way. Political parties means that there exists choice for the people. Absence of political parties makes it a 1 man ruling without the necessary checks and balances. Like in that of a monarchical ruling t, or military ruling. Essentially, one can do and undo as one wishes.
Now, the advent of political parties brings choice, meaning the people can choose. In a situation where party A doesn't fulfill its political campaign promises, they are at risk of being voted out by the people for party B. Party B themselves won't sit down idle, while not in power, they wake the people up to the wrongdoings of party A.
Like I said, the presence of political parties brings choice to the people, and also creates checks and balances. So, yes, they have kept the country intact.
Answer:
answer is below
Explanation:
Slavery was the act of using African-American people to work in harsh conditions with little to no pay, these people did work such as cleaning, picking cotton fields, being assistants, and doing farm work. A few notable people that abolished slavery was Martin Luther King Jr., Fredrick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, John Brown, and some more. They did this through peaceful protests, escaping with inside jobs(people who would free them when there was no supervision), and escaping while doing work.
The nativists believed that immigrants would destroy America. So, option (b) can be considered as the suitable option.
<h3>Why do nativists oppose immigration?</h3>
Joel S. Fetzer claims that conflicts over national, cultural, and religious identity frequently lead to hostility to immigration in many nations. Particularly in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, as well as in continental Europe, the phenomenon has been examined. As a result, the term "nativism" has evolved to refer broadly to opposition to immigration motivated by worries that newcomers may "distort or corrupt" preexisting cultural norms. Nativist movements try to stop cultural change when immigrants outnumber native-born people by a wide margin.
Many of the following arguments against immigrants are used to support immigration restrictionist sentiment :
Economic :
- Employment : Immigrants take occupations that would have been open to native citizens otherwise, which reduces native employment. They also produce a labor surplus, which drives down wages.
- Immigrants incur a cost to the government since they do not pay enough taxes to pay for the services they need.
- Social welfare systems are heavily utilized by immigrants.
- Housing : As vacancies are reduced by immigrants, rents rise.
Cultural
- Language : Immigrants refuse to pick up the native tongue and withdraw into their own communities.
- Culture : As immigrants outnumber the local populace, their culture will take its place.
- Crime : Compared to the native population, immigrants are more likely to commit crimes.
- Patriotism : Immigrants erode a country's feeling of ethnic and national identity.
To know more about, immigration, visit :
brainly.com/question/17124402
#SPJ9
Answer:
to create a written constitution
Explanation:
