Answer:
They became more concerned with foreign policy.
Explanation:
The tenth commemoration of the 9/11 assaults has turned into an event for reconsidering the fear mongering danger to the United States. Three key inquiries have been raised. What is the status and current quality of al-Qa'ida, the gathering that executed 9/11? Have measures taken since 9/11 made Americans any more secure today? Why has the United States not been assaulted once more—in any event in the feeling of being assaulted on a scale moving toward 9/11? These are beneficial inquiries, despite the fact that they each include a confined point of view toward psychological oppression and counterterrorism. The first is naturally constrained by being centered around just a solitary assortment of fear mongering or even only a solitary gathering. The second more often than not precludes reference to any standard of progress and disappointment in verifying Americans from psychological oppression or to the expenses and exchange offs involved in getting a given level of wellbeing. The third inquiry is normally longing for a clarification that would be too easy to even think about being a precise examination of what has decided the measure of psychological oppression coordinated against the United States during the previous decade.
The first scientist to challenge the concept of race was Franz Boas.
Not sure why you placed in the history category but it is 1 and 5/8
There really isn't anything positive for a war at all just mostly negative and the bad things are the following: Lost so many innocent lives, soldiers lost their lives from wars and in camps and prisons, so much money that could've been used for better purposes was wasted on some war, and countries went from allies to enemies even to this day.
