1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maksim231197 [3]
3 years ago
12

What advantages did the southern Patriots have over the British in the South?

History
1 answer:
Svetlanka [38]3 years ago
6 0
In the South, really the only advantage that the patriots had in the South over the British was knowledge of the land, and in some places, the support of the people.
You might be interested in
What was the impact of the Age of Enlightenment Central Idea 3 <br> Central Idea 4
frozen [14]

Answer: 1738

Explanation: im like hey whats up hello

3 0
2 years ago
Which statement best describes the event of February 4 1861
nikdorinn [45]
<span>On this day in 1861, delegates from six states — South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia and Louisiana — met in Montgomery, Alabama, to establish a new unified government, which they named the Confederate States of America.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
The quote below is an excerpt from a speech given by Winston Churchill in 1946:
Alik [6]
<span>Based on what I know about the Cold War and the quote you gave above I would choose this option: It showed that democratic nations were facing a threat from Soviet expansionism. 

Churchill had no plans to attack the Soviets or liberate these states. It was merely about pointing out the spreading of communism and that the western nations should join forces to contain it.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Why do justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents?
Mila [183]

Answer:

he most important type is the majority opinion. In most cases, a majority opinion requires five Justices, unless one or more Justices have recused themselves from a given decision. The majority opinion is important because it defines the precedent that all future courts hearing a similar case should follow.

HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!!!!!! XDDDDD

5 0
4 years ago
Why do you think the state leaders believed they should have written constitutions?
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

The adoption of the Declaration of Independence of 1776 entailed the need to establish regional governments. Separation from the mother country meant that the North American territories were no longer colonies of the British Empire, but became independent states. Already in the early stages of the development of the self-determination process, a conflict with Great Britain became apparent. The revolutionary movement had previously intended to break with Britain as a whole, and it was imperative to establish some form of legitimate government. The main efforts were initially aimed at ignoring the power of the royal governors. Provincial congresses or committees formed in various ways sought to go their own way with the adoption of their own constitutions.

Speaking about the prerequisites for the adoption of the constitutions of the colonies and the future federal constitution, it should also be noted that the constitution, being the main law of the state, reflects the most important patterns of the development of society.

The constituent parts of the preamble of the constitutions were bill of rights, or a declaration of rights, which contained a list of bourgeois-democratic rights and freedoms, as well as guarantees of the inviolability of the person (freedom of conscience, freedom of the press, right to a speedy and impartial jury trial, the right not to give evidence against self).

The legal and political ideas and views of prominent revolutionaries such as Payne, Franklin, Adams, Jefferson served as an important prerequisite for the adoption of the constitutions of the colonies and the federation. It is no coincidence that in the period preceding the US Declaration of Independence, many European legal ideas experienced a rebirth in the New World. So, on the eve of the creation of an independent North American state, in 1775, the famous lawyer, enlightener, future second US president John Adams argued that the purpose of the constitution was “the creation of a government of laws, not of people,” that is, a power based on impartial rules and regulations and not on the prejudices or preferences inherent in man.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the historical reason for the separation of powers?
    11·2 answers
  • Please help me with a conclusion.
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a consequence of Britain’s policy of appeasement?
    9·2 answers
  • Write a Thesis Statement about the Isolation of the US in the early years.(1800's) Use three reasons
    9·1 answer
  • When Benito Mussolini came into power, he promised to
    9·2 answers
  • I need help ASAP <br> What are the pros and cons of pacifism
    10·1 answer
  • How do historians know what goods were being traded from 1493-1550?
    9·1 answer
  • Please help me I don't understand and I don't understand :((<br> (Please don't do it for the points)
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement BEST describes why the Georgia State Flag changed designs?The 1956 Georgia state flag caused controversy for nea
    13·2 answers
  • A scatter plot is constructed for two quantitative variables. For which pair would you most likely not use a linear model?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!