The reason why partitioning and fractioning are different is because; The ratio given is part to part. The total number of parts in the whole is 1 + 3 = 4.
<h3>Why is partitioning different from fractioning?</h3>
It follows from the task content that a close analysis of the statement of ratios; 1:3 implies that the whole is divided into four parts; 1+3 = 4.
On the contrary, one-third simply means 1 out of 3 equal parts of the line.
Read more on fractions;
brainly.com/question/17220365
#SPJ1
The answer to the question is true
Answer:
= 22.5°
= 67.5°
Step-by-step explanation:
Let’s create a system of equations for and .
Complementary angles are two angles that add up to 90°, so
Also, is thrice of g:
We can now substitute in for .
Now, we can find by substituting into either equation.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
The given parameters are;
Two triangles each with known measures of two sides of the triangle and a non included angle
Therefore, with the given information, each of the the triangles are undefined because the sides can be opened wider or narrowed to have two possible solutions, in the same manner a compass, having one leg at a fixed inclination to the drawing paper can have the second leg either come closer or go further than 90 degrees while the inclination of the one (first) leg remains the same.
In a linear functions, f(x)=mx+b, your y-intercept is b. So any function that is any number times x plus 3 is going to give you a y intercept of 3.