Define and describe the Middle Passage

History

2 answers:

PtichkaEL [24]3 years ago

4 0

Well it was horrible, like the holocaust but in a ship.

kvv77 [185]3 years ago

4 0

The Middle Passage refers to the part of the trade where Africans, densely packed onto ships, were transported across the Atlantic to the West Indies.

You might be interested in

When using a website, we should ask the following questions:

Allisa [31]

Answer:

All of the aboveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is imperialism?

Stolb23 [73]

Answer: Imperialism is a policy or ideology of extending a country's rule over foreign nations, often by military force or by gaining political and economic control of other areas.

For short:

a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means.

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How important were James Watt's contributions to the Industrial Revolution?

Mumz [18]

James Watt was an inventor and mechanical engineer whose improvements in steam engine technology drove the Industrial Revolution. Watt did not invent the steam engine. He made important changes to the design, increasing efficiency and making steam engines cheaper to run.

Hey mate!!!!!! I hope this was helpful if yes please mark me brainliest.

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following states are embraced these ideas following world war 2?

Ronch [10]

Answer:think a hope it helps

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

What accounts for the success of absolutism in some parts of Europe and its failure

Ghella [55]

Answer:

Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. And this reality could be social, political or religious.

Explanation:

I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.

France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. The question is: why this conception worked in France? Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.
On the contrary, in England, the king was subjected to the Parlament. However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). This idea attests that a king has duties with its people, and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.

8 0

4 years ago