Answer:
Así, al final, el emperador romano, con su guardia y su casa, gobernando un imperio explotado para llenar su tesoro, era esencialmente indistinguible de esos jefes bárbaros con los que chocaba.
Los romanos siempre habían despreciado a los "bárbaros" y creían que las tierras de los bárbaros (como Escocia y Alemania) eran en gran medida inadecuadas para la civilización, por ser demasiado frías y húmedas para el tipo de agricultura mediterránea a la que estaban acostumbrados los romanos.
<span>popular sovereignty is what i think it is </span>
Answer:
The answer on edg is A.
Explanation: i dont feel like explaining just mark me the brainliest ;)
c) An academic journal that describes all of the presidential candidate's political beliefs and philosophies
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,
However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."
We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.
The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.
