Answer: Social contract; A belief that God does not intervene with the laws of the universe
Explanation: A <em>social contract </em>is the Enlightenment idea of an unofficial treaty or agreement between people and the government that exists in democratic societies in some forms today. As one of the Enlightenment philosophers, Rousseau suggested that all people with equal natural and human rights, with whom all were born equal, submit to the protection of these rights to the government and authorise it to be the guarantor of the preservation of those rights.
<em>Deism</em> is the doctrine by which God created the universe and everything in it, the planets, among others the Earth, humans, and then withdrew. He left it to humans, that is, the creation, to govern what was created according to the laws of the nature. From this it can be seen that Deism is one of the starting points of the Enlightenment, because many of the Enlightenment philosophers believed in God but not according to Church teaching, but precisely to the idea that after creation of the world God had withdrawn and left it to people. For this reason, Deism rejects supernatural religious phenomena as is the case with Church teaching, such as Revelation, and advocates ethical behaviour and engagement in the advancement of society, the state, and community.
Answer: The Civil Rights Act of 1957 was the first civil rights effort made law by Congress. The act established the Civil Rights Section of the Justice Department. It was the first legislative action to protect civil rights.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was made segregation and racial discrimination illegal. This represented a further upgrade on the legislation passed in the year 1957.
1957 - It was an act to provide equal rights to all men, regardless of skin color. 1964 - The Civil Rights Act banned the use of different voter registration standards
If this helped you please give me a heart and 5 stars?
comment if you got it correct!!
Have a good day!
Answer:
Actually yes it could have.
Explanation:
The only compromise that could have headed off war by then was for the Southern states to forgo secession and agree to abolition. Once the Confederate states seceded and troops fired on Fort Sumter, the only solution possible was complete Southern surrender.
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.
Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.
A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.
In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.
Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy, the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.
A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.
If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.
There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.
