Maybe it means that there’s a difference between how much land they own or something. It says there was a difference between the amount of land they occupied and the amount of land they couldn’t control. So maybe they didn’t own/have a lot of land but there was a lot of land they couldn’t get to/take over etc. or maybe this situation could be vice versa so they have a ton of land but only a little isn’t “controlled” let me know if this helps sorry if it’s confusing I’m just guessing based on the context clues :)
Answer:
The American Indian Movement (AIM).
Explanation:
The<em> American Indian Movement</em> was founded in 1968. It was led by<em> Dennis Banks, Clyde Bellecourt, Vernon Bellecourt and Russell Means. </em>The movement advocated the <em>civil rights of the indigenous people, particularly the Native Americans.</em> Protests were held in order to address grievances of poverty and brutality of the police power.
With the help of the movement, the interest of the Native Americans started to be valued. These allowed them to move to the urban society in order to look for jobs. The police activities that were against the natives were also monitored in order to ensure that the natives won't be exploited. The movement also addressed several issues regarding the treaties and also helped preserve the culture and tradition of the natives.
Veto power .hope I'm right I'm checking it up
Answer:
If i had to guess, id say 3, or c, because that's about money, and economics usually has to do something with money
Explanation:
