The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The reasons and historical events that led to the creation of the United Nations were the following.
The historical events can be traced back to the end of World War II, after the Allied forces defeated Germany, Japan, and Italy. The world witnessed too much suffering and destruction like never before seen. Even more, with the launching of the atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan.
There were some previous charters, treaties, and agreements that inspired the foundation of the United Nations. We are talking about the Declaration of St. James Palace of 1941, teh Atlantic Charter of 1941, the Yalta Conference of 1945, and in the same year, the San Francisco, California Conference in the United States. All these works served to establish the foundation of the United Nations on October 24, 1945.
The United Nations differed from the League of Nations in that teh League of Nations was the result of the agreement between the main European superpowers after World War I, without the participation of the United States. Meanwhile, the United Nations was the result of the idea of 50 nations during the conference of San Francisco, California. There was a plurality of ideas that enriched the agreements to create the United Nations. Another important aspect of the UN that did no have the League of Nations, was the capacity of the UN to come up with resolutions that could be enforced. And this was not the case of the League of Nations. Another important consideration is that the United Nations promotes peace around the world, supports the progress of societies in all nations, and invites for the respect of human rights.
Simply put, by coercion.
There was a very simple process that followed:
(1) the Red Army invades the countries, on the pretext of "liberating" them - this gives a plausible veneer to a treacherous end;
(2) whilst occupying, Soviet commissars would prop up the local communist party (typically, enjoying only minimal support from the country's population, unless also nationalist) - this is so as to have a puppet regime-in-waiting;
(3) under Soviet occupation, typically some sort of a "referendum" or "plebiscite" will be held, at which SUDDENLY the voters will "decide" to abolish the previous constitution and to enact one that practically gives sole powers to the local communists - this is to give the effective coup d'etat a veneer of legitimacy;
(4) once installed in power, the communist party will effectively take over the machinery of state by staffing all key posts with its members;
(5) through the use of secret police and kangaroo courts, opposition, incl. those of the original governing class who did not have the good sense to escape, will be physically eliminated, sentenced to long prison terms, exiled, otherwise incarcerated;
(6) a the takeover of the state is usually followed by a takeover, through nationalisation or outright confiscation, of the economy, giving the regime financial muscle;
<span>(7) the established position will be upheld by the same means it was acquired and with unparalleled degree of ruthlessness, with the country taken over being treated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kremlin Holdings.</span>
Positive! He was one of God's most faithful servants
Keynesian or pump priming philosophy, In other words, money should be held in the working class of the people. Their spending would set the pace for the economy because it would then determine how businesses and companies would set new demands and needs for the new hired workers. This was controversial and interesting because it was exactly the opposite of the previous Republican model of "Trickle Down economics"
Serbia and greece
..................................
