1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
asambeis [7]
3 years ago
8

Arguing that there was no trade between Europe and East Asia in the early Middle Ages because there are no written records of su

ch trade is like arguing that the yeti, an apelike creature supposedly existing in the Himalayas, does not exist because there have been no scientifically confirmed sightings. A verifiable sighting of the yeti would prove that the creature does exist, but the absence of sightings cannot prove that it does not. Which one of the following considerations, if true, best counters the argument?
A) Most of the evidence for the existence of trade between Europe and East Asia in the early Middle Ages is archaeological and therefore does not rely on written records.
B) Although written records of trade in East Asia in the early Middle Ages survived, there are almost no Europe documents from that period that mention trade at all.
C) Any trade between Europe and East Asia in the early Middle Ages would necessarily have been of very low volume and would have involved high-priced items, such as precious metals and silk.
D) There have been no confirmed sightings of the Yeti, but there is indirect evidence, such as footprints, which if it is accepted as authentic would establish the Yeti's existence.
E) There are surviving European and East Asian written records from the early Middle Ages that do not mention trade between the two regions but would have been very likely to do so if this trade had existed.
History
1 answer:
Oxana [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

E.

Explanation:

(A) focuses on the wrong argument ---it's focusing on whether this trade actually existed, by-passing the argument by analogy.

(B) irrelevant

(C) irrelevant

(D) this just changes the nature of what counts as evidence in the analogous argument, but it doesn't demonstrate fundamentally why the Yeti-to-trade analogy argument is flawed.

(E) This brings up a major shortcoming of the analogy. In the case of trade between Europe and East Asia in the early Middle Ages, there are written records where this trade would have been very likely to have been mentioned if it existed, and it's not mentioned. In that context, the "no mention" is actually very strong evidence against the existence of such trade

You might be interested in
What document gave only Parliament the power to tax
astraxan [27]
Magna carta is the document that gaveonly parliament power to tax
7 0
3 years ago
Whose expeditions contributed to the accomplishments of the Ming <br> Dynasty ?
Anastaziya [24]
The answer is Zheng He
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer this question before making any changes to spending percentages.
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

National defence and Social security

5 0
3 years ago
In general terms, how did the social makeup of U.S. military forces during World War II compare to or contrast with the wider Am
xeze [42]

The armed forces replicated patterns in the larger society in the 1940s.

For the most part, U.S. forces looked much like the civilian world. African Americans fought in segregated units. Women served in positions similar to their civilian jobs: as clerks, nurses, and communications operators.

<h3>How much does the US military relate to society?</h3>

The armed forces are a pillar of US power and influence around the world, deployed all over the world. However, many civilians are unaware of their composition. Women now account for 16% of the enlisted forces and 19% of the officer corps.

<h3>What percentage of the US population is in the military?</h3>

The active component of the military, excluding the coast guard, numbered 1.9 million men and women at the time, or about 1% of the population. There are currently about 1.3 million active-duty personnel, or less than half of one percent of the US population.

<h3>What role did the US military play in the Revolutionary War?</h3>

The U.S. Armed Forces have been crucial to American history since their inception during the American Revolutionary War. Their victories in the First and Second Barbary Wars contributed to the development of a sense of national identity.

Learn more about U.S. military forces during World War II:

brainly.com/question/14683299

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Why did the Second Continental Congress create the Continental army in preparation for a possible war with Great Britain?
Tasya [4]

Answer:

Explanation:

To prevent war, the 2nd Continental Congress made one more try to prevent war with England. They sent a message to King George. To prepare for war the Continental Congress would appoint George Washington as Commander In Chief and act as a central government and put together an army for the colonies defense.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Most present-day Israelis originally came from _____.
    5·2 answers
  • Why did the greeks struggle to unit under one political unit?
    11·1 answer
  • How did President Bush try to solve the nation's debt problem?
    12·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE!!! I NEED HELP!!!!!
    7·2 answers
  • How would the Stamp Act be an example of "Taxation without representation"?
    15·2 answers
  • Which was an achievement of Suleiman I?
    10·1 answer
  • What did the colonies of Maryland and Pennsylvania have in common?
    10·2 answers
  • Supporters of the Constitution agreed to add a bill of rights in order to... a) win ratification of the Constitution. b) support
    10·2 answers
  • Which nickname was given to the city of New Orleans during the antebellum period?
    10·2 answers
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise resolved the issue over whether ​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!