Answer:
Liquidated Damages
Explanation:
Liquidated Damages are provisions made in legal contracts to allow a party recieve payment of an amount of money in case the pre-agreed contract terms are breached.
Liquidated damages are allowed most especially in legal contrcts where the potential losses to one of the parties is difficult to define especially at the formation of the contract.
Since the agreement was for G to remove his property by 5th of April but did not do so until the 9th of April, the $400 agreed upon for the hotel expenses is liquidated damages. In any case, M will still bear a loss of $100, which is the difference between the $500 spent and the $400 agreed as liquidated damages.
Source.
In order to count any type of evidence as valid or credible, you would first need to determine if the source of the said evidence is valid.
There's a lot of problems African farmers confront. Firstly, they usually don't add pesticides to the crops, therefore, the insects will devour the crops. Secondly, lack of finical support, they're not able to grow their fields and make profit out of their hard work. Thirdly, the climate change; since most people don't care about climate change, most people in remote countries will have to face the different weather patterns. Lastly, the technology, most African farmers have to hand pick each crop instead of having a machine.
I hope this helps! This is all in my own words...
In the scenario given above, Country
X's culture is more collectivist than that of the United States.
<span>To add, the political philosophy, social outlook, moral
stance or ideology that stresses the group and its interests is called
collectivism. Its opposite is individualism. </span>
Answer:
Option E (Judicial activism
) is the appropriate choice.
Explanation:
- A decision delivered throughout favor of enforcement of foreign awards by the judiciary who disregarded past arguments, as well as earlier constitutional rulings or someone who has served a greater shared objective, termed as Judicial activism.
- It should be utilized just to characterize a published as well as unpublished administrative revision attitude of a magistrate.
All other alternatives are not connected to the given query. So the above is the right approach.