The Underground Railroad is not a railroad that is underground, instead, it is referring to a secret passage for slave escaping in safe houses. The conductor of the Underground Railroad could be the person who helps the slave escape, the lines could refer to the road or the passage which the slaves escaped from one safe house to another, the station could refer to the stops they make in the safe houses, and the freight may refer to the slaves that are escaping.
Here is the answer "<span>William Howard </span>Taft<span> in </span>Progressive<span> Era Politics. William Howard </span>Taft<span> (1857-1930) was the 27th </span>president<span> of the United States and Theodore Roosevelt's hand-picked successor. ... His administration nonetheless pursued more antitrust suits than Roosevelt."</span>
Answer: B. Huayana Capac was the most successful ruler of the Inca.
Explanation:
A successful ruler can be judged by many things and in the past one very important metric for being successful was increasing the area of your country. People like Augustus, Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan were therefore very successful leaders.
In that same vein, Huayana Capac was the most successful ruler of the Inca according to this map. Under him, the Inca empire grew significantly as he added areas in modern day Chile, Bolivia and Argentina to the empire.
The U.S intervention in the boxer rebellion was a problem for three main reasons:
- Americans in China were taking advantage of China's culture and resources.
- The Chinese people lost independence since Americans wanted to show other nations that they were superior to China by introducing them to other traditions, religion and products that changed their own.
- During the rebellion, there was a great number of Americans in the country.
Your Answer: is the emeritus William Robertson Coe Professor of History and American Studies and professor of political science and law at Stanford. He is the author of six books, including Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution (1996), which won the Pulitzer Prize in History. And, he is a past president of the Society for the History of the Early American Republic.
Michael Rappaport is the Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law, and the Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism at the University of San Diego School of Law. He previously worked in the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice. He’s the author of Originalism and the Good Constitution co-written with John McGinnis.
Jeffrey Rosen is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Constitution Center, the only institution in America chartered by Congress “to disseminate information about the United States Constitution on a nonpartisan basis.”
Explanation: Your Explanation In early August 1787, the Constitutional Convention’s Committee of Detail had just presented its preliminary draft of the Constitution to the rest of the delegates, and the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were beginning to parse some of the biggest foundational debates over what American government should look like. On this episode, we explore the questions: How did the unique constitutional visions of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists influence the drafting and ratification of the Constitution? And how should we interpret the Constitution in light of those debates today? Two leading scholars of constitutional history – Jack Rakove of Stanford University and Michael Rappaport of the University of San Diego School of Law – join host Jeffrey Rosen. Hope this Helps! :D Happy Early Christmas! :D
