Dictionaries provide different definitions of words, as a well as pronunciation, syllabic division and parts of speech.
On the other hand, a thesaurus contributes with synonyms, antonyms and related concepts.
<u>Dictionary entry for the word zephyr:</u>
<h2>
Zephyr </h2>
/'zefər/
[zeph-yr]
noun
1. a gentle breeze.
2. any lightweight clothing.
<u>Thesaurus entry for the word zephyr:</u>
<h3>Synonyms for zephyr</h3>
1. wind, blow.
<h3>Antonyms for zephyr</h3>
1. hurricane, storm.
I Haven’t seen you for a long time
<span>Obudziłem się pewnego dnia, ubrałem śniadanie. wtedy mój tata powiedział mi, że jedziemy do wesołego miasteczka! Zjedliśmy duży wielki lejek i kukurydzę. Byłem bardzo przerażony kolejką górską, ale wciąż mi się to podobało. Było 18:30, kiedy zdecydowaliśmy, że nadszedł czas, aby wrócić do domu. Miałem świetną zabawę, mam nadzieję, że mogę przyjść ponownie! |
</span>
<span>Mam nadzieję, że dostaniesz A +
</span>
Answer:
It could be D or C But D Makes more sense because Steam does not burn you
Explanation:
Answer:
The potential advantages explored in the text, regarding equipping machines with a sense of morality are that they can be an asset to humans by being able to complete tasks and make wise, split-second life and death decisions; such as, when not to clear buildings with civilians in them during war situations. Paragraph 8 states that Ronald Arkin, a computer science professor and robotics expert at Georgia Tech, has been developing software, referred to as an “ethical governor”, which would make machines capable of deciding when it’s appropriate to fire and when it’s not. Another advantage, as stated in Paragraph 9, is that machines will not be vulnerable to the emotional trauma of combat or to the desire for revenge. It will be free of emotions and emotional ties to other individuals and/or machines.
The potential disadvantages explored in the text, regarding equipping machines with a sense of morality are that they could be a serious threat to human safety; especially since their moral compass will be based on that of a human’s. That, within itself, leaves a lot to be desired. In Paragraph 19, it states that human ethics are a work-in-progress, and we still confront situations for which we don’t have well-developed codes. The text also mentioned in Paragraph 9 that machines could evolve and get rid of us.
Explanation:
