Answer:
The answer is: Rose will be taxed as receiving a $15,000 dividend distribution.
Explanation:
Since Parent Corporation owns 70% of Child Corporation, for tax purposes they are considered as one single firm. Rose is the main stockholder of Parent Co. so for tax purposes she is also a stockholder in Child Co. When Child Co. gives her $15,000 in exchange for Parent Co. stock, this would be considered as a dividend distribution rather a stock sale.
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer:
.............................
Explanation:
Answer:
$10,000
Explanation:
A company's income is either shared out as dividends or kept in as retained earnings. Therefore, the total of retained earnings and dividend paid out is the net income. This is the amount that will reflect in the income statement. In other words, income is calculated first before dividends or retained earnings are declared.
For Martinville, income will be calculated first before dividends are paid. Net income will be
=revenue - expenses
=$17,000 -$7,000
=$10,000
Balance in the Income Summary account was $10,000
Answer:
-Say nothing to his co-workers since this was a private conversation and he could lose his job if his boss found out he was spreading sensitive company information
Explanation:
Since in the situation it is mentioned that Mark accidentally heard a confidential phone conversation in which the possibility of layoff in the sales division would be discussed he is not in danger but some of his friends are the sales representatives so mark would not tell anyone as it is a private conversation and he could lose the job if the boss knows that the information is spread by mark
Therefore the second option is correct
