Answer:
"Nobody steals it" in the passive voice is: It is stolen by nobody.
Explanation:
When changing a sentence from the active to the passive voice, the first step is to find the object of the verb and transform it into the subject of the new sentence. In this case, the object is "it".
Secondly, we must identify the main verb and its tense. In this case, it is "steals", in the simple present. We must now add the auxiliary verb to be in the same tense, but agreeing with the new subject "it".
Finally, the subject of the active voice - "nobody", in this sentence - becomes the agent of the passive voice, preceded by "by". Having those instructions in mind, we can safely transform the sentence we were given:
- "Nobody steals it" = It is stolen by nobody.
It is necessary because if you don't have a confirmed opinion with textual evidence to back it up you wont have a good argument.
Answer:
Chinatown in San Francisco.
Explanation:
The setting of a story can be the geographical location, time period, or anything that can tell the readers about the location of the scenes. This provides the backdrop for the scenes that will happen and also acts as an added detail to the story.
Amy Tan's "Rules of the Game" is set in <em>"San Francisco's Chinatown"</em>, with the narrator explicitly stating that out in the third paragraph of the story. The story revolves around a Chinese-American girl named Waverly and her family, and the efforts to be at par with American life.
Kafka’s inadequacy about Gregor's sexuality is represented in
his personality. Gregor didn’t marry, and in the story there
is nothing about his relationship with any woman. Keep up the good work! :D
The correct answer is D. Division
Explanation:
A fallacy refers to a faulty argument or argument that is invalid due to problems in the reasoning process, these issues are classified into different types of fallacies such as ad hominem faulty analogy, division, etc. In the case of division fallacy, this occurs when the speaker assumes something is true and valid about the parts that compose a unit just because this is true about the unit or the whole, which means the speaker believes. This occurs in the argument "That baseball team won the World Series, so the players must be outrageously talented baseball players", because the author of this argument assumes all the players are "outrageously talented" because the team or whole is talented, which is invalid as there might be players that are not that talented although the whole team was able to win.
