All categories

3 years ago

Why did Aristotle's geocentric theory fail to match the expected predictions?

1 answer:

6 0

Aristotle's geocentric theory failed to match the expected predictions because a few celestial objects appear to have retrograde motion.

Answer: Option B

<u>Explanation:</u>

Aristotle’s theory states that all the bodies in universe rotate around the earth, and earth is located at the centre. But, the most serious challenge it was given was that, the difference found in the paths of revolution of mercury and Venus. They are revolving around the sun, and not the earth, periodically.

This is the significant drawback, and major factor for the Copernicus and the other models to be achieved. The mercury and Venus, closest planets to earth, and the sun too, are not following the earth’s path. And hence, upon studying clearly, all celestial bodies do not follow a path round the earth, but around a fireball, that is sun.

You might be interested in

In the final stages of production, a pharmaceutical is sterilized by heating it from 25 to 75C as it moves at 0.2 m/s through a

steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

The answer is " $12682.267\ \ \frac{W}{m^2}$ "

Explanation:

Calculating the mass flow rate of fluid:

$m= \rho AV$

$= \rho \frac{\pi}{4} D^2\ V\\\\= 100 \times \frac{\pi}{4} \times (0.0127)^2\times 0.2\\\\=0.0253 \ \frac{kg}{s}\\\\$

Calculating the amount of heat transfer.

$q =m\timesC_p(T_{m,0}-T_{m,i})$

$=0.0253 \times 4000 (75-25)\\\\=0.0253 \times 4000(50)\\\\=0.0253 \times 200,000 \\\\= 5060 \ W$

Calculating the required value for heat flux:

$q"=\frac{q}{A_s}$

$=\frac{q}{\pi DL}\\\\= \frac{5060}{\pi \times 0.0127 \times 10}\\\\= 12682.267 \frac{W}{m^2}\\$

3 0

3 years ago

The spring constant in a given oscillating mass spring may be changed by

tia_tia [17]

(D) None of the above.

5 0

4 years ago

The time, t, required to drive a fixed distance varies inversely as the speed, r. It takes 3 hr at a speed of 14 km/h to driv

kenny6666 [7]

Answer:

time taken with speed 23 km/h will be 1.8 hours or 1 hour 48 minutes

Explanation:

Given:

Time is inversely proportional to the speed

mathematically,

t ∝ (1/r)

let the proportionality constant be 'k'

thus,

t = k/r

therefore, for case 1

time = 3 hr

speed = 14 km/hr

3 = k/14

also,

for case 2

let the time be = t

r = 23 km/h

thus,

we have

t = k/23

on dividing equation 2 by 1

we get

$\frac{t}{3}=\frac{k/23}{k/14}$

$t=\frac{14\times3}{23}$

t = 1.8 hr = or 1 hour 48 minutes ( 0.8 hours × 60 minutes/hour = 48 minutes)

4 0

3 years ago

dem82 [27]

Answer:both are body waves often associated with seismic waves

Explanation:

Both are body waves often associated with seismic waves as in earthquakes

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A tree is standing in the middle of a meadow. As you watch, the wind begins

Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

B) The tree was stationary and began to move.

Explanation:

This situation can be explained by using Newton's first law of motion, which states that

"An object at rest (or in motion at constant velocity) stays at rest (or in motion at constant velocity) unless a net non-zero force is exerted on it"

This means that an object at rest can start moving if and only if there is a net non-zero force acting on it.

In the example in the problem, the tree is initially stationary. Later, it started to move. According to Newton's first law, therefore, there must be a net force that caused this change of state of motion of the tree. Therefore, the correct answer is

B) The tree was stationary and began to move.

8 0

3 years ago