Answer:
1. Andrew Carnegie
You probably recognize Andrew Carnegie’s name, since he’s one of the most famous and richest industrialists of all time. However, he didn’t accumulate his wealth as a result of formal education or a business-charged background. Instead, he dropped out of school at a young age and spent the major portion of his youth performing manual labor. He was a bobbin boy at a local cotton mill and then became a telegraph messenger. It wasn’t until he taught himself how to read and entered the railroad industry that he began to build the empire that would make him (and his family) a fortune.
2. John Paul DeJoria
You may not have heard of John Paul DeJoria, but you’ve certainly indulged in some of the beauty products attached to his name. Now a multi-billionaire and one of the most accomplished entrepreneurs in modern history, DeJoria got his start as a newspaper courier. To make ends meet, he worked as a tow truck driver and a janitor. Eventually, he found his way to working at a hair-care company, where he met his future partner, Paul Mitchell. With minimal experience and a $700 loan, the duo founded a company now known as John Paul Mitchell Systems. From there, DeJoria co-founded Patron Spirits and the House of Blues.
3. Harland Sanders
If someone asked you for a loan to start a restaurant, but had no formal culinary training or experience, would you make that loan? It seems crazy to think anyone could become a successful restauranteur without a background in the industry, but that’s exactly what Harlan “Colonel” Sanders was able to do. When he started his line of Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants, the only experience he had was cooking for his siblings as a child and working at a number of odd jobs.
We have
that
Cost
total-------------------------$10 coupon+$30.25=$40.25
<span>ice
cream costs $1.50*2</span>=
-$3
<span>admission
cost $18*2</span>= -$36
<span>soda
cost $X*1</span>=
-$X
$40.25=$3+$36+$X
$X= $ 1.25
a
soda costs at the amusement park $ <span>1.25</span>
Due to the greatest cost of goods sold, the LIFO (Last In Last Out) technique displays the lowest net profitability. Compared to the other techniques of inventory valuation, the cost of goods sold for the LIFO approach is the greatest.
<h3>Which technique of inventory valuation will result in the lowest net profit?</h3>
The application of LIFO will produce the lowest net income and the greatest estimated cost of goods sold among the three options during periods of inflation.
<h3>Which method of inventory has the lowest income tax rate?</h3>
LIFO is the inventory cost flow method that yields the lowest income tax liability. A form of inventory cost flow mechanism called last-in-first-out (LIFO) operates under the presumption that the last item acquired will be the first item to be sold.
<h3>In an era of inflation, which inventory method results in the lowest income tax?</h3>
Due to increasing COGS, LIFO leads to reduced net income (and taxes). However, under LIFO during inflation, there are fewer inventory write-downs. Results from average cost are in the middle of FIFO and LIFO.
To Know more about techniques
brainly.com/question/13655064
#SPJ4
Answer:
[C] Strike price minus the premium
Explanation:
A put buyer refers to the one who purchases a right (and not the obligation) to sell(put) the underlying asset at a pre determined strike price/exercise price at a future date.
A put buyer is under no obligation to exercise his right of selling the underlying asset. He will exercise his right only when his strike price is greater than the current market price upon expiry of the contract.
Put Buyer's profit is expressed as;
= Strike price - Option premium paid - Current market price upon expiry
Thus, his NET sales proceeds are equal to his Strike Price as reduced by Option premium paid.
Answer: A 4-year bachelor's degree in a PR-related area like journalism, marketing or communications is frequently required for entry-level positions. Many colleges or universities offer specific public relations certificate programs or majors.
Explanation:
